(link does not work
For me, more than disturbing.
Human right price - Committee - courage toward controversy:
Mr Minton, you take over!
Open letter to the millionaire Bob Minton
Hello Mister Minton,
Ursula Caberta, head of the office of the „Arbeitskreise Scientology“
of the Hamburg interior senate, considered the Laudatio as a winner of the
Alternative Karlspreises in the year 2000 for you with the award of the
prize in Leipzig. It was certainly a touching day for you!
Unfortunately it was not possible for me to comprehend the conversation
date projected by you and Mrs. Brooks through an ex-Scientologist during
your stay in Hamburg. Also, at my trips into the USA the appointment book
was so narrow that a visit was not possible in your LMT! Now, in Miami I
found out that you have also your problems of course. You are revered as a
"multimillionaire" in the so-called critic rings. You are
supposed to have had your own experiences with financial requests onto
you. Your longtime companion, Ms Stacy Brooks, can explain surely to you,
as one in Scientology defines unpleasant beings - speaking of: "Body
Thetans"! To me it seems, spoken graphically, also stick some persons
at you! However, Mister Minton, you know surely, that it matches in the
nature of the thing that millionaires have many so-called friends.
Now for my request: On 10th June 2001 will be a further award of the prize
in Leipzig. This years winner is the former Federal Minister Dr. Norbert
Bluem. With you, it was Mrs Caberta which held the laudatio at your award
of the prize. She is also member of the European America citizen committee
for human rights and religion freedom in the USA.
Now I rise a some sensitive topic: I find it extremely embarrassing, that
the woman that held your Laudatio, that sits in a such important, provided
with large words committee, and have a leading function in the Hamburg
Interior senate, is embedded in such financial difficulties!
You were really already so friendly and gave Ms Caberta a helping hand
with a generous loan. Perhaps it is possible to expand this loan. Because
there is a problem again.
You know surely of the court procedures that I was forced against Ms
Caberta. I had to complain through several instances against Ms Caberta.
It was a question of defamation, bad slanders and subordination. I know,
embarrassing, however, but what I should I have done? She made it to her
aim in life, to character assassinate me, at all possible times! How to
defend myself if not with legal tools? That is how it works in a
constitutional state! As an American you know that one can only defend so.
Law of the jungle is also proscribed in the USA! You too complained
recently against the Scientology organization in Germany. A lot of
applause was bestowed on your procedure in the scene which reveres you.
I do not expect at all that my successes before court are annotated
positively by this scene. Because, Mister Minton, exactly the woman that
held your Laudatio, manifestatives an enemy picture against me since
years, that stands contrarily to that, what I mean by "Human
Mister Minton, a question to you as the winner of 2000, to you as an
American! What means freedom for you? What law? What do human rights mean
for you? Are there different ways of slander, bad slander,
abusing-criticism, character assassination with the destination to
annihilate the opponent? Where is the difference between a lawsuit, that
you open against the Scientology organization and I against a Ms Caberta,
Hamburg senate employee in leading position? Do the facts not remain the
same one? Slander remains slander?
Now it looks like this that according to my evidences, that a Ms Caberta,
can do by far more than a Scientologist without being pulled for the
account. Now it becomes tricky! And I think, you know what I mean! In my
case, the judges still certified that it is not a question of Ursula
Cabertas judgement, but exclusively about the slandering and defaming!
Mr Minton, and now? Is something like this also written in the judgment
obtained by you against Scientology in Berlin? Do we talk now about right
once again? From human right? You do not want to explain now to me that
there is a difference between a procedure against Scientology and a
procedure against a Ms Caberta?
Both respondents defamed! Therefore? Why the one is hyped against
Scientology by a champagne expert scene, the other one against Caberta
hushes up? Is this justice? When, which one? Or is there a difference
between the events?
You do not mean now, because it was a question with your procedure of
Scientology and at my around a Hamburg senate employee? Such a thinking
would be really fatal! If you thought something like that as a winner of a
human right price! Because otherwise we would have to discuss publicly now
what human rights mean to you and to the committee before the new award of
Perhaps also alike, when explanation exposes and becomes the farce! Or for
the alibi function of a dark scene! However, also about whether this years
medal carrier Dr. Norbert Bluem is informed about the backgrounds of this
We must discuss it publicly, because there is it, the difference!
The scene of your German-speaking supporters, the same people that are on
a congratulation list, as well as to minimize the costs for the award
ceremony, do difference there very precise.
They conceal and hush the actions that appertain to the clan of the
experts; Group dynamics catches! All which runs onto hypocrisy, falseness,
envy and malevolence, intrigues, annihilation strategies and character
assassination in this scene, all is swept under the carpet!
I am a victim of this critic sect, which honoured you, Mr Minton, with a
human right price! And again your longtime companion, Ms Stacy Brooks, can
explain to you what I mean with "enemy annihilation"! She was
long enough in Scientology, in order to be able to tell to you, what that
I experienced it! However, now from both sides! And in a so perfidious
kind, that the procedure of the office conductor Ursula Caberta exceeds
that of Scientology by far! You read correctly, your celebration speaker
for the human right price!
Because she hides herself behind her position. Is covered by authorities.
Supported by politicians! Carried by people that explain sects, in spite
of all her known actions that are far from all christianity onto which
this scene places so big value!
Completely to be silent from the violation of the most elementary rights.
How you deal then with these procedures, the machinations of a dark scene
that is not called Scientology, but experts on the subject Scientology!
You know the valid judgment of the regional court Hamburg in the ZDF
lawsuit against Caberta? Confirmed at the Hamburg regional court of
appeal. No? Why not? The judgment reason should interest you as a medal
carrier! For example the judges say, that the procedure of the Hamburger
employee of the Interior senate, Caberta, against me is not compatible
with the neutrality commandment of her position!
And still a very personal question: Why do ex-Scientologists ask me
whether I give the LMT information in the USA? Information, that Mrs
Brooks would like to have, that she could get it in fact much more easily
from Ms Caberta. Yet due to the narrow cooperation?
Perhaps you address that all once, at the best with officials of the
condition protection bureau. Because there, all which I express here is
known! And still much more! I suspect that between you and the gentlemen
from the service would not be any language barrier!
Why the bureaus knew about the machinations in the Caberta case, but never
reacted, just kept silent, must be clarified! Yet because of not letting
the constitutional state become a farce.
I did not know at all that you have a problem with so-called
"scrap-immovables" in Germany. Oh, you do not have? The bill of
the Mr Fuellmich onto your organization had other grounds! I would have
wondered that you could be tricked into scrap immovables in Germany! I
assume that you know that lawyer Fuellmich is in narrow cooperation with
Mrs Caberta. You can look that up also in the ZDF judgment against
Caberta. Oh, also in the two judgments that I obtained against lawyer
And now too to my request: Would it be possible for you to increase the
financial credit you already provided to Ms Caberta? Because she still
hasn't paid a lapse judgment before the LG Duesseldorf from the assessment
of costs decision AZ 12 0 219/00. The lawsuit gained by me at last.
Whether it had to do now with the political problems of her ex-chief, Mr
Wrocklage, is not known to me! My writing directed in person onto Mr
Wrocklage with the facts was never answered!
We will see how the new service gentleman, inside senator Scholz, will
evaluate the documents sent for the Caberta case! Perhaps more sober and
dissociated from as a Mr Wrocklage. Maybe little less felts, especially as
citizens-election is in September in Hamburg! One does not have to
introduce him to his office head Caberta anymore, he knows her already
from the political job in Altona!
To me is not either known, from which grounds an office as those ones of
Ms Caberta can be "moved in an unknown way". Because writings of
the court to the service address indicated by Ms Caberta came back with
this note - moved in an unknown way -.
Now a so-called multi-purpose task of my attorneys was issued on 1st June
2001 to the Hamburg district middle court . Enforcement request,
application for an oath-governmental insurance(?) and arrest application
in the execution Hartwig against Caberta.
The postal address "Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Behörde für
Inneres Arbeitsgruppe Scientology, Eiffestrasse 664 B, 20537 Hamburg"
is supposed to be correct according to bailiff.
It only goes around approx. DM 7000.- this time. Therefore, Mister Minton,
it it would be once more possible that you help out your celebration
speaker with a small loan?
Mister Minton, nevertheless the appearance must be preserved at least.
Nevertheless you already helped out with a loan and with an invitation to
Clearwater. In the year 2000, just suiting the date. Because with the
PR-gag brought from the USA, Ms Caberta could hush up the ZDF judgment
well against her, and feed the press with the pursuit against her in the
USA. Bare good that your delegation was technically good equipped at the
airport. Because so, the PR-machine could start in the Internet, perfectly
for Ms Caberta! You are really a good friend!
Do you also help out now? With the lost, unpaid lawsuit costs of Ms
Caberta! Because it is completely unserious, and what picture does it show
of such such circles near the press and the public, when a committee
member of the "European-American Citizen Committees for human rights
and religion freedom in the USA" is confronted with such an
application of the bailiff, shortly before the award of the prize 2001
onto the former Federal Minister Dr. Norbert Bluem!
The judgments did not disturb anybody, you also not, last year at your
prize ceremony. There there were already two alone from me! Only now the
bailiff comes into the Hamburg inside authority! Embarrassing, more than
embarrassing! Slander, lose, and then not pay- I do not know !?
Therefore my call onto you - Mister Minton, you take over !