|
gemmamp1@aol.com (GEMMAMP1)
wrote:
>Diane, please take note -- here's your proof of Dierdre's
statement -- that it is the people who
think they aren't vulnerable that are
the most vulnerable to mind control. Better than any journal article or double-blind study could ever do!
[See
post of Ralph Hilton at the end of this post]
Monica, I'm not at all sure why you have directed this response to
Ralph Hilton to me. Surely, as a professed social scientist, you
must
realize that one cannot reach generalized conclusions about *all*
humans based on the words of one individual.
I also don't understand how you can assume that Ralph Hilton has a
"mind" that's being "controlled" based on the
statements he has made
in reply to you. Did you reach that conclusion just because his
opinion differs from yours? Or have you interviewed and analyzed
Ralph Hilton so thoroughly that you can be positive that he is a
victim of "mind control"? Have you considered that he
might be
suffering from something other than "mind control"? Or
have you
narrowed your vision to the point where the world is composed only
of
cultists and anti-cultists?
The chances of Ralph Hilton finding your reply to him under a header
addressed specifically to me (in all caps) are rather slim. Are you
really interested in having him respond to the questions you ask him
below? If you are, I'd suggest you change your header to "RALPH
-
Here's your Proof!"
Diane Richardson
referen@neont.com
>Monica:
>>>I realize that this is not something that most people
want to believe, that our minds can be controlled but until we do come to
grips with this issue, it will continue to happen to people. If we can
learn about these processes, only then can we prevent such atrocities from
happening.
>Ralph:
>>Monica - maybe your mind can be controlled - mine can't
without a very considerable amount of duress. And that is a GREAT deal of
duress. Scientology gave me that. If you had studied LRH fully you
might have realized that - but you preferred to be reasonable.
>Oh I see, Ralph. I am weak and out-tech
and you are strong, in-tech and totally on-source! Sorry, I don't buy it. From the statement you
just made (chock full of loaded language that I didn't study LRH and
preferred to be reasonable, whatever that means), you are still under the
influence of Elron Flubbard and the tek which is still controlling your
mind. At least I had the strength to confront what was really going on
and the BS I had fallen for and I did it after six years and got the hell
out. Believe, me it took a tremendous amount of strength for me to
get up and walk out and I've never regretted it for a moment. Six years of
studying scienotek was quite enough for me, thank you very much. It isn't
that I didn't study the Scienotek, it's that, after doing nothing but
study it for six years, I chose of my own free will to reject it. On that
point, I am completely reasonable and rational and proud of it. I have
found much better in the 20 years I've been out.
>And what would you call being in the Sea Org and the RPF? Isn't
that alot of duress? However, it doesn't take physical torture for a mind
to be controlled, no matter what LRH said. It can be done in a much
more low-key, subtle manner and to some quite intelligent and strong
people.
>Monica Pignotti
>Celebrating 20 years of freedom!
|
