1. Spiritual effects - Scientology
techniques have the potential to create powerful effects that are
felt by the person to be highly spiritual. It often is what
motivates members to stay within the group despite aspects with
which they may otherwise disagree. In time, the negative aspects
tend to wear out of memory, but the strength of the energy
awakened in the soul can leave an important imprint that can
motivate the person, even though he left the group, to
search further in that direction. From a spiritual point of view,
thus, and despite its negative aspects, Scientology can act as one
of the many channels that can help one to awake his spiritual
potential.
This does not mean - that there are
no other means to have the same experiences. It doesn't mean that
everybody necessarily goes through a spiritual awakening in
Scientology, or even that this is what they need or want. However,
the very attraction and focus of cults is often a spiritual one.
Not to include this aspect in the overall equation is missing one
of the most important element to understand the whole issue.
2. Social effects - Another major
appeal of Scientology is the group experience, allied with a deep
sense of purpose. This is something which society usually don't
offer and which constitutes a major attraction of cults in
general. Again, these are deep rooted spiritual longings, and the
strong impression the experience leaves upon the member's soul is
such that most of the time he will value his time in the group
long after he has reintegrated mainstream society.
This does not mean - that the group
can actually live up to its promises, and a cognitive dissonance
is often inevitable. The Messianic zeal, the lack of a democratic
feedback mechanism, and a society that is often hostile, makes
that demands made on the group members are very high and that
internal group dynamic problems and conflicts can become
exacerbate. The positive and the negative aspects are each a side
of the same coin, and the subsequent interpretation made by the
ex-member of his experience within the group will depend of his
disposition and outlook in life.
3. Psychological effect - While
fundamentally a spiritually-oriented philosophy, Scientology
technique can also address psychological problems without
reference to spiritual concepts. This often is the first
experience newbies have with Scientology, and it can sometimes be
so strong that it remains their prime interest. Someone who has
been completely liberated from an heavy emotional trauma he
carried for years is not likely to quickly believe the "criticism"
that is being levied against Scientology. It also is an area
where, unlike the spiritual aspect, stable result can be obtained.
This does not mean - that other
therapeutic techniques can't obtain similar results, or that
Scientology technique always have that level of success. The main
problem remains of course that valuable psychological techniques
in Scientology are always part of a larger cultic package. This is
one of the prime reasons some Freezoners try to set valuable
aspects apart from the organization. As a matter of fact, many
Scientology therapeutic concepts have now been integrated
throughout more accepted alternative therapies, or even within the
mainstream courant.
4. Positive orientation -
Scientologists in general are nothing like the dishonest, liar,
and stupid person many critics like to portray. On the contrary,
they often are idealistic, honest, and intelligent individuals.
Even though having its cultic aspects, Scientology contains
principles and techniques that can help others have a better life
and become a better person. For example, rather than "being taught
to lie", as critics generalize, using an out of context example,
Scientologists are shown how lying and being dishonest eventually
cycles back to them through universal law, and they will be less
likely to indulge in such actions than the average population. In
fact, Scientology will usually encourage its members to be a more
productive, a more creative, and a more responsible member of
society.
This does not mean - that actions by
Scientologists will always be positive. The cultic aspect
present in Scientology can bring its member to engage in
destructive actions, all the while being convinced they are doing
the greatest good. This isn't something reserved to Scientology,
but is rather common everywhere the cultic mindset is present -
most visible, by the way, among so-called "critics". Another
drawback is the fact that what can be a help can also act as an
hindrance when it becomes mechanical. Relying on outside system
can become conditioning and prevent one from seeing things
directly through his own perceptions. Combined with the cultic
aspects, this can be a bigger problem than it would for a system
that don't make people utterly dependent from it.
5. Cultic lesson - I often say that I
learned about as much from having been in Scientology as from
having gone out from it. While in the group, I learned many
things: a true sense of purpose, solidarity, group dedication,
heightened awareness, self-improvement, responsibility, etc. At
the same time, realizing the cultic nature of Scientology, and
what the cultic mindset is in general, was about as enlightening.
Discernment, discarding the false to keep only that which is true
and lasting, is an integral part of the spiritual path.
This does not mean - that one
necessarily have to go through a cultic experience such as
Scientology to learn about discernment. It is, however, a good
school. Those who have gone through this kind of experience and
went out from the group without falling in the opposite delusion
represented by the anticult mindset, usually have an higher level
of critical thinking ability than many so-called "critics". What
the later do is hardly more than mindless bashing. They still have
to realize the extend of their own form of cultic mindset.
This web site is
NOT created by a Scientologist. It is created by a Scientology EX-MEMBER
who is critical of Scientology. However, this ex-member is ALSO critical
of the anti-Scientology movement. This does not make him a
Scientologist, nor a defender of Scientology.