(Please note: this page is under
Describes her experience of being ordered
to stop her medications in 1972 but forgets to say that this
order was canceled by L. Ron Hubbard himself. She also blacks
out all the subsequent events present in her 2003 affidavit that
shows how she was allowed for 31 years in Scientology while on
The claims she makes (in addition to her
video and press statements) are summarized in her channel
response in which after numerous instances of inconsistencies
being pointed out, she still does not see what is wrong with her
presentation. Here is a screenshot:
From Magoo's affidavit:
"After much arguing, I finally told
them I wanted a pen and paper as I was writing Hubbard. He wrote
me back and informed me I was not a Freeloader and that was
incorrect. I needed to pay for the 2 courses I had then taken
and "continue getting auditing in the HGC and we will see you up
Claims that she was again ordered to stop
her medication in 1979, when in fact it is clear from her
affidavit that this was her own decision.
"In 1979 I was AGAIN ordered off my
medication, by C of S--and ended up in Morton Plant Hospital."
From Magoo's affidavit:
"So if I were to achieve OT, I would
be done with Seizures, one would think. [...] After attesting to
OT 3, I once again tried to get off of my medication, only to
end up in a hospital with status epileptis, or many seizures."
Forgets to mention that in 1989, after an
other illegal order by a 15 years old boy, the order was again
over-turned by the senior C/S who also wrote a bulletin saying
people should not be prevented from taking their medication and
who sent to review the staff who tried to stop Tory from taking.
"In 1989 I was told "You are not allowed
on the Flag Land Base."
From Maggo's affidavit:
"Long story short, I fought ALL of the
technical people there and insisted my folders be sent up to RTC
(the top Management/Technical people). After one month of
reviewing my situation, the Senior Case Supervisor called Flag
and told them I had a FULL Ok to do all of the levels up to OT
8. They also sent a full Cram (Correction) for every single
Technical terminal there re medication, and they wrote a Senior
C/S International bulletin, and I'm the first example. It
basically says if someone has tried to get off of medication and
they cannot, and they have an OK from their Doctor, they should
not be stopped from getting auditing."
Magoo continues to claim that the CoS
does not allow people their medication, in spite of the fact her
affidavit proves the contrary and that there exist apparently a
C/S bulletin doing so, official statements from the CoS, and
several testimonies contradicting Magoo's latest assertions.
Justification for lying:
"I fought the CoS for 30 years over this"
- giving the impression that she was not allowed to take her
medication until 30 years later. Is of course another lie. After
the 1972 episode she only had to fight 17 years later with the
Flag Land Base incident in 1989. After this, she stayed another
11 years with no problems until 2000 when she left the Church.
Add another 3 years, from 1969 to 1972 when she was not bothered
about it either. In total, she spent 3 months in the incident
she describes, out of 30 years virtually problem free.
"I was considered as a leper" -
subjective impression very different from being ordered to stop
her medication. Given her obvious paranoia as a critic, I have
some doubt that this subjective impression reflects anything in
"You are trying to change my story" -
nobody is changing anything. The affidavit she made in 2003 is
freely available. The "message to Travolta" video is available
online. The statements she made to the press are public and
available too. It is easy to compare the two version and see for
Tory's testimony is the only one I know
that claim she was forced off of her medication. There may be
others, but I don't know of them.
On the other hand, I have seen quite a
few testimonies to the contrary in the aftermath of the Jett
Travolta tragedy. Here they are"
"I took an epilepsy medication called Topamax for over a
year and my family in Scientology didn't freak out in the
least. It was a powerful medication, so they were
concerned--but they didn't try to talk me out of taking it.
And when it helped they were happy that it worked for me."
"I have a friend who is epileptic and a Scientologist and
she takes her meds and does Scientology and has for years."
"I can add some personal experience to this, namely from
knowing two epileptics and Scientologists who are taking
their medicine regularly. "
"For example, my neighbor, who is a Scientologist, has a
child who is autistic. She has a doctor she takes her boy to
and she follows the treatment program the doctor
The first poster posted nothing more than
something like "Magoo forgets to say that the orders to stop her
medications were reversed by higher authorities and that she
spent 30 years in Scientology while being allowed on her
medication. Google Tory 2003 affidavit". The message was deleted
and the user banned. She made a quick lying justification
message that ended by "you deny it? SAY IT HERE", knowing full
well that the poster could not respond since she already banned
The second poster reposted the message
and again she deleted it and banned him.
I recorded the third poster through
screen shot. He made four no-spam posts, factual, short and
simply addressing ongoing discussions. Three of these four
questioned the inconsistency and the fourth was about an
unrelated question. She deleted the three and let the fourth.
In reaction to her censorship, the fourth
poster replied directly to posters. This has for effect that a
copy of the message goes in the inbox of the poster, where Magoo
cannot delete it, in addition of being posted on channel. In
reaction she let (so far) one of these message with some
justification trying to riggle out of it, and boasting how it is
good that critics can ask people to look at both side - this
after repeatedly trying to censor the dissent in question!
Justification for censoring:
"You don't care for me" - irrelevant
"This is black PR"- it only is legitimate
questions about the inconsistency between the two versions.
Often times, the messages were little more than "Google Tory
2003 affidavit and compare the two versions". Talk about "black
PR". It is exactly the same as when Scientologist claim that
dissent is "entheta".
"It is a distraction" - since when
on-topic legitimate questions and pointing to inconsistencies in
a democratic debate is a "distraction"?
What Tory is saying to the press:
Other critics reactions: